• 0

Marketoonist | Tom Fishburne

Marketoonist is the thought bubble of Tom Fishburne. Marketing cartoons, content marketing with a sense of humor, keynote speaking.

  • Campaigns
  • Speaking
  • About
  • Cartoons
  • Contact
  • Book
  • 0

lost in translation

June 13, 2010 4 Comments

100614.lostintranslation.jpg
  • Paid licensing options include high resolution download.
  • Presentation $35.00 Add to Cart
  • Newsletter or Website $100.00 Add to Cart
  • Corporate Blog/Sponsored Post $50.00 Add to Cart
  • Looking for other licensing options? click here
  • View Cart
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

I had a “Lost in Translation” moment a couple weeks ago in a meeting with 20 French and Russian executives. It was the first time I’d ever been in a meeting where someone simultaneously translated the discussion into ear pieces. I spent the whole meeting wondering if they really understood what we were trying to communicate. Many of my jokes fell flat and their questions back (through the same translator) seemed like non-sequiturs.

This language gap made me think of the cultural gap that exists in business, particularly around innovation. We may all speak English in business life, but that doesn’t mean that we speak the same language. Innovation that challenges the status quo is particularly foreign.

I once took a class with Clayten Christensen, who wrote The Innovator’s Dilemma and coined the term disruptive innovation. He described that businesses typically ignore disruptive innovations. Even if they recognize a disruptive innovation, they are reluctant to take advantage of it, because it threatens their existing business. Often they wait to take action until it is too late.

While taking this class, my bike route took me past the Polaroid headquarters in Cambridge. They were a classic case of a business that ignored a disruptive innovation in digital photography. As if to prove Christensen’s point, Polaroid filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection midway through the class. Failing to acknowledge a disruptive innovation ultimately led to the demise of the company.

When trying to advance any form of innovation that challenges the status quo, we have to recognize the cultural intertia that will block those types of projects. Without overcoming the translation gap, those ideas will never get off the ground.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Get a new marketoon each week:

Previous Post Next Post

law of the brainstorm

100531.lawofthebrainstorm.jpg

after the brainstorm

100621.afterthebrainstorm.jpg

Browse similar cartoons in: Uncategorized

Browse By Category See All Marketoons

4 Comments

Join the Discussion
  1. Ted Simon says

    June 13, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    Good observations, Tom.

    Polaroid’s a great example; it was like they got hit by a train. Come to think of it, that’s a whole INDUSTRY that hid its head in the sand from disruptive innovation. 🙂

    Cheers,
    ted

    Reply
  2. Euonymous says

    June 14, 2010 at 6:32 am

    We all saw that train heading toward Polaroid. A business school case study from maybe 20+ years ago indicated that Polaroid’s early success was in part attributable to magazines and newspapers not allowing them to advertise because of their early financial situation. TV, however, did take early Polaroid ads, and the rest is history. Sometimes fate works in your favor. Nothing forced Polaroid to go digital until way too late.

    With respect to translations, you may enjoy this: At a science fiction convention in Metz, France years ago the guest of honor was Robert Bloch (who wrote Psycho). He only spoke English. The assembled group spoke English, French, or both. He told some very funny stories. One of which was about seeing the original “THE FLY” with Vincent Price and at a key point in the movie paying the ultimate complement that a 10 year old boy could pay to a horror movie: he wet his pants. Everyone who understood the story in English roared with laughter. Then came the French translation. Another roar of laughter. Then another uprising roar of laughter as the group responded to the dynamics of the translation. Best bilingual experience ever!

    Reply
  3. Patrick_joiner says

    June 15, 2010 at 7:40 am

    It’s easy to look back on digital photography as a disruptive technology now; I can still remember my digital camera in the mid to late 1990s that was maybe 640×480 pixels and looked terrible compared to film. At that time the convenience of digital photography didn’t outweigh the fact that the photos were difficult to distribute to people and prints looked very jagged. Not to mention the fact that flash memory was not so cheap back then.

    I think it was only after the advent of megapixel cameras, cheap flash memory, AND the infrastructure for printing (including sites such as Shutterfly as well as lower cost color printers) that what seemed like a novelty became a real threat. The speed at which these changes happened finished off Polaroid and almost Kodak as well.

    Polaroid has come back though with the Pogo (http://www.polaroid.com/Products/Polaroid+PoGo/Overview/Overview/1804); now the disrupted has become the disruptor. If they had come up with the Pogo in the 90’s they would be in a much better position now. We’ll see if this catches on.

    Reply
  4. Rick Mueller says

    June 16, 2010 at 11:25 am

    Pogo’s only uniqueness is in the product itself – consisting of a built-in printer which uses proprietary paper to make small (photo size) color prints on demand in a very compact frame.

    Success in Disruptive Innovation (per Christensen) also requires an avoidance of head to head combat with current industry incumbents.

    By targeting existing customers of that industry, Polaroid is placing itself at great risk and is missing an enormous opportunity to gain the traction it will need to regain dominance in its industry.

    Consider what might result if Polaroid were to apply this technology to print photos, screen shots, documents, and other files from smartphones instead. THAT would have the potential to become a GENUINELY disruptive innovation.

    From the perspective of disruptive innovation, the current strategy (going head to head with existing incumbents in the digital photo industry) is just plain stupid and has little if any opportunity to even become successful, much less disruptive.

    Rick @
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/decisionscience

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Paid licensing options include high resolution download.
  • Presentation $35.00 Add to Cart
  • Newsletter or Website $100.00 Add to Cart
  • Corporate Blog/Sponsored Post $50.00 Add to Cart
  • Looking for other licensing options? click here
  • View Cart
Your Ad Ignored Here Book Image

15 years of Marketoonist compiled for your marketing pleasure.

Order Now

About Marketoonist

tom_image

Marketoonist is the thought bubble of Tom Fishburne a career marketer and cartoonist. Learn More...

Subscribe

Get a new marketoon delivered to your inbox each week.

 

Browse Blog Posts

Most Popular Cartoons Browse Categories

Marketoon Campaigns

contentmarketing

Content marketing with a sense of humor.

Learn More

Keynote Speaking

speakingworkshops

Insightful, funny, and visual keynote talks and workshops.

Book Tom to Speak

Search Blog Posts

Interested? Let’s Talk!

Marketoons

Browse Categories

Get New Cartoons Weekly

About Marketoonist

Tom Fishburne is the Founder and CEO of Marketoonist, a content marketing studio that helps businesses reach their audiences with cartoons.

© 2023 Marketoonist