• 0

Marketoonist | Tom Fishburne

Marketoonist is the thought bubble of Tom Fishburne. Marketing cartoons, content marketing with a sense of humor, keynote speaking.

  • Campaigns
  • Speaking
  • About
  • Cartoons
  • Contact
  • Book
  • 0

brand loyalty

February 10, 2013 30 Comments

  • Paid licensing options include high resolution download.
  • Presentation $35.00 Add to Cart
  • Newsletter or Website $100.00 Add to Cart
  • Corporate Blog/Sponsored Post $50.00 Add to Cart
  • Looking for other licensing options? click here
  • View Cart
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Brand loyalty can be pretty fickle. Marketers often overestimate the motivations of their brand loyalists and how prominent their brands are in their consumers’ lives.

This is particularly apparent when more than half of all grocery items are sold on price promotion. We train consumers to buy our brands on deal and then wonder why we have so many brand switchers. To exacerbate the challenge, many categories feature very little difference across competing products, making it even easier to substitute brands.

Very few consumers are exclusive to any one brand in a category. Most consumers shop a portfolio of regular brands depending on what meets their needs at the time.

This dynamic has led to very different points of view in the marketing community. Kevin Roberts from Saatchi & Saatchi describes the goal of marketing as the creation of “loyalty beyond reason”. Marketers should focus on creating more brand loyalists and “brands that create an intimate emotional connection that you simply can’t do without. Ever”.

Byron Sharp, author of “How Brands Grow”, argues that brand loyalty shouldn’t be the focus at all. Instead of creating more brand loyalists or deeper brand loyalty, marketers should accept that loyalty isn’t important and invest our time on everyone else. “Most of a brand’s customers think and care little about the brand, but the brand manager should care about these people because they represent most of the brand’s sales; the brand needs these people if it is to increase its sales.”

I’m interested in your thoughts on how much effort marketers should invest in growing brand loyalty.

(Marketoonist Monday: I’m giving away one signed print of this week’s cartoon. Just share an insightful comment to this week’s post by 5:00 PST on Monday. I’ll pick one comment. Thanks!)

Here are a couple other cartoons I drew on this theme, in 2005 and 2007.

Filed Under: loyalty

Get a new marketoon each week:

Previous Post Next Post

super bowl advertising

tv advertising hashtags

Browse similar cartoons in: loyalty

Browse By Category See All Marketoons

30 Comments

Join the Discussion
  1. Melike says

    February 10, 2013 at 10:31 pm

    Brand Loyalty is not the objective. It is a measure of it. We won’t get there unless we ask this simple question for anythink we do: “What is the value for my consumer in this project?”

    Reply
  2. Tessa Stuart says

    February 10, 2013 at 11:42 pm

    If you improve their life, humour, enjoyment in any way or give them back the gift of time or improve their status or give them something they can be first with if they are an Early Adopter like me, then you might enjoy some brand loyalty.

    Otherwise you are a box or a bottle on the shelf.

    Reply
  3. Kevin McFarthing says

    February 11, 2013 at 1:11 am

    Hi Tom – far too often marketers talk about the concept of brand loyalty as an absolute; consumers are loyal or they’re not. In reality it’s a spectrum. At one end are those people who will put a brand in their shopping cart without thinking, ignoring any deals or offers. At the other end are the consumers who are totally dollar-driven. So marketers should be thinking more about the degree of loyalty, and trying to move more consumers up the spectrum.

    The other concept to consider is the degree of consumer involvement in the category. Beauty products, for example, generally have a much higher degree of brand loyalty, certainly stronger protection against private label. Categories like these are much more about the brand and less (but not totally) about the dollar.

    Brand premiums are all relative – if everybody’s on offer, the relativity should still be there.

    Reply
  4. Archita says

    February 11, 2013 at 1:30 am

    I agree with Tessa. The brand needs to be present at touch points which matter the most to the consumers and enhancing their experience there. For eg. A brand making my long commute to work easier/household work less cumbersome/phone battery last longer!

    Loyalty might be a thing of the past, so continuous presence has become key, as against spikes in communication and engagement. This does lead to heavy spending, but in a world where brands are battling for higher affinity, it seems necessary.

    Reply
  5. Kevin McFarthing says

    February 11, 2013 at 3:27 am

    Just read this interesting blog from Drew Boyd with good comments on different types of loyalty – http://www.innovationexcellence.com/blog/2013/02/09/the-fabulous-five-loyalty-factor/

    Reply
  6. Kyle says

    February 11, 2013 at 5:12 am

    Having read “How Brands Grow” I agree with the sentiments that increasing the base of “light” users of almost any brand would move the needle more than a “loyalty programme” which in most cases isn’t really about connecting with consumers and driving loyalty on the surface or emotional levels.

    Reply
  7. Bill Carlson says

    February 11, 2013 at 5:24 am

    Never have believed much in the idea of “loyalty beyond reason”… Not sure you can really measure it, anyway, so I’m not sure you can every really claim success at it.

    Fundamentally, what we want are repeat purchases — but it’s a mistake to equate that with loyalty. I purchase groceries several times each week from one particular retailer — easy for that retailer and the brands they carry to call me loyal but in reality, it’s simply because that store is most convenient for me. If that chain moved out and their competitor moved in, I would start looking loyal to them… And even then, only if my shopping trip starts at home — all bets are off if I need to “stop on the way home…”

    All that being said, if a brand thinks, plans, makes decisions based on how to earn loyalty, it can’t hurt!

    Reply
  8. DSprogis says

    February 11, 2013 at 6:09 am

    A brand on my mind is Hyundai. I bought a Santa Fe two years ago and I love it. Five years ago I would have laughed at you if you said I would be driving a Hyundai. What changed? It started when I read about the Hyundai CEO’s approach to building better cars. He started with the 10 year warranty then told manufacturing not to bankrupt the company by building under-performing cars. That was gutsy but it got right to the point – Total Cost of Ownership for 10 years.

    I have to be honest, I like the styling of the BMW X5 and the VW Touareg a bit more. But my Santa Fe performs every bit as well – including in the snow storm we just got here in New England – and I love that I am paying almost half the cost of the other vehicles!

    Now I have to get my wife out of her 328xi and into an Azera or a Sonata – after three years, every trip to the dealer is another $1,000 or more!

    Reply
  9. Tracy Carlson says

    February 11, 2013 at 6:14 am

    Creating loyalty means offering something people have a reason to seek out. This is usually expressed by a price premium (something they’ll buy even when it’s not on sale, or when a competitor has a a more attractive offer), but not always. Most brands/products simply aren’t that differentiated, so others are perfectly good substitutes. If the Trader Joe’s in my town closed, I would drive to another town for it. Not so with the local (struggling) supermarket chain, but price isn’t really the issue.

    Relatively little effort seems to be focused on creating and maintaining the kind of brand/product people will seek out. In my CPG days, we seemed to spend most of our time and money chasing marginal volume: the 10%-15% that would make or break our plan. Yet the brands I managed that had something genuinely different to offer fared far better. Coincidence? Um, not exactly.

    Reply
  10. Kim OQuinn says

    February 11, 2013 at 7:17 am

    I represent a sugar manufacturer that has been in business for over 100 years. Bottom line is that sugar is a commodity. Without customer loyalty, the brand wouldn’t survive. Period. Our customers are very passionate about the brand, but it doesn’t hurt that we regularly drop coupons. We cultivate a community of bakers and encourage them to convert their followers too. Brand loyalty does still exist. You just have to find a way to tap into it.

    Reply
  11. Alex Villeneuve says

    February 11, 2013 at 7:17 am

    I do believe in the concept of brand loyalty but it definitely has limitations. In some categories, consumers may be extremely loyal (think Jordan brand sneakers to sneakerheads) but those same consumers may not develop “emotional connections” in other categories.

    But where I think a lot of marketers get into trouble is that they mistaken believe loyalty is forever. Brands should really be focused on borrowing customers rather than owning them for a lifetime. I’m guessing that most people who read this don’t still shop at or eat at the same places they did when they were in high school, people grow at change but it’s a mistake for your brand to try to grow with them. I think Abercrombie & Fitch does a good job with this. When I was in high school, wearing Abercrombie was a badge of honor, but in college no one wore it. They stick to their youth demo very well and I think that’s one reason why its been so successful.

    Reply
  12. GK says

    February 11, 2013 at 7:40 am

    Perhaps a different perspective: how often do we mistake “routine”, “habit” or “familiarity” for “loyalty”? Even for things that are truly a commodity, I know that I will tend to stick with the familiar over something different, even if it means paying more. In fact, I really don’t even pay attention to the price. I probably couldn’t tell the difference between any two mainstream ketchup brands, but I put Heinz in the cart without a second thought. When I need ketchup, I get Heinz. Pretty much any laundry soap will do the job, but when I need some, I grab Tide and don’t even bother looking at the other brands. It’s habit. I know it works.

    If either of those products stopped working for me, then I’d consider something else. But until then, I go with what I know. I’m pretty sure that neither of those two innocuous products are materially any better or worse than their competitors. But I pick them anyways. If either of them disappeared from my usual store, it isn’t like I’m going to go hunting around to find them elsewhere. But while they are available, I get them. Is that loyalty in any meaningful sense? I’m not sure.

    Reply
  13. Jack Issen says

    February 11, 2013 at 7:54 am

    We are only really loyal to brands that give us something extra, additional to the product or service experience… When we think the brands we (want to) associate ourselves with make us (look) cool to our neighbours, friends and co-workers. Like certain tabacco brands associating very succesfully with adventure.
    In the Hyundai example (I drove one for a few years btw) the experience outmatches his expectations (on price/quality), but I bet that in a few years DSprogis wil imagine how cool he will look when buying another Hyundai, or when buying another brand 😉
    For all cars the expected operational cost per mile can be calculated to the penny, but why do some of us rather buy the more expensive cars or wish we could…?

    Reply
  14. Simon McEvoy says

    February 11, 2013 at 8:02 am

    I think the whole concept of ‘bought’ loyalty, through discounting or points schemes, is old fashioned and consumers are tired of it. Brands have to switch the question on themselves and instead of asking – ‘how can we get our customers to be more loyal’ they need to ask ‘how are we showing loyalty to our customers’? They need to provide advice, impartial guidance, useful services, tools or entertaining experiences. They need to add value through values and community activity rather than just a kickback to wallets.

    Creating true brand loyalty means the brand has to give without any guarantee of receiving. If you want people to like you as a person, be nice to them and show them love. The same logic extends to brands. That means defining a clear set of values and personality, something which many brands struggle to do with any authenticity.

    The bottom line is, if a brand isn’t prepared to show genuine loyalty to it’s customers, then why should it expect those customers to show loyalty to the brand? Customers that are ‘bought’ will be just as easily bought off as soon as a better offer comes along.

    Reply
  15. Josh says

    February 11, 2013 at 9:02 am

    As a consumer, I can see the point here about how I do substitute brands when they have deals. And also that some deals just won’t make me switch because my current brand has always given me what I want at the right price for me.

    As a marketer, I work in entertainment and technology, which has a ton of passion around it. That passion inspires people to follow brands, talk about brands, and be a part of their life (less consumable, more functional and fun). And it does create a true community. This actually leads to a network affect where these consumers are loyal themselves but also to their network, making them very sticky. Great for a leading brand, and more challenging to break that habit when a challenger.

    Reply
  16. Concetta says

    February 11, 2013 at 9:38 am

    Great points by Tessa and GK. As a consumer, I go to the brands that I know are “safe” for me to eat because they seek the certifications that they are gluten free (I have celiac disease) and label every possible ingredient. I don’t often stray from them because to do so means taking an unnecessary risk to my health. Am I loyal, though? Not exactly. I flirt around a few brands that I know do the same things and I’m not above trying a new brand that’s got the certifications necessary.

    As a marketer, I firmly believe that we have to have a quality product and build our marketing around the facts, engendering a sort of loyalty around the quality. If that happens, then the “loyalists” will come. Kevin above mentioned the article about the different types of loyalty – I personally find the “heart loyalists” a little scary. I don’t want them to spout off personal missives about the Gods of the company, I want them to go and tell the world that my product rocks.

    Reply
  17. Shaun Smith says

    February 11, 2013 at 9:41 am

    Hi Tom,

    I think marketers think about loyalty completely the wrong way round. I believe brands should show loyalty to their best customers by giving them additional value because these customers are typically much more profitable. Yet many brands offer better deals to new customers in an effort to woo them from competitors. Guess what, if we show loyalty to our best customers they will probably reciprocate by staying with us. What goes around often comes around.

    Reply
  18. Mickian says

    February 11, 2013 at 9:41 am

    Good and especially timely for me because I’m in the process of bring a new product to market and was concerned about brand loyalty. Thanks for the insight.

    Reply
  19. Toni Keskinen says

    February 11, 2013 at 10:58 am

    There are many kinds of loyalty driving means. Brand loyalty emotional or rational or combination of both is an approach, but there are others:

    Rational
    Emotional Loyalty
    Habit based loyalty
    Legal loyalty
    Structural bonds
    Imprinted customers

    Here’s more about alternative loyalty strategies http://futurecmo.org/2012/10/26/loyalty-for-pragmatists-its-not-about-loyalty-schemes/

    Reply
  20. David S says

    February 11, 2013 at 11:26 am

    Brand Loyalty Today… The “80” customer typically cares less about the brand and more about the price. The sales channels today are drastically different than 10-15 years ago, largely due to internet and mobile technology advances. This definitely affects brand loyalty but more so on commodity products and services. It’s hard to get that warm fuzzy feeling about a product when you know a similar product under another brand, at a lower price, will also provide you with that same warm fuzzy feeling! The premium brand will usually get that last look but the justification for premium brands is a moving target! Price vs. comeptition is the new warm fuzzy feeling.

    Reply
  21. Danni B says

    February 11, 2013 at 2:44 pm

    If Brand Loyalty = repeat purchase and positive WOM (Word of Mouth) to friends and family,
    Then I’d classify myself as a ‘brand cheater’

    Once upon a time I loved Nokia, then I love Apple, now I love my Samsung Galaxy (Phone). I have no doubt I’ll change in future when something else comes along.
    …. and I’ll wait until it’s on sale to buy it. 🙂

    I and many others will do this with many products/brands over time (be it years or days).
    Brand Loyalty is only a measurement in the ‘present’ and is very hard to calculate honestly for consumable items.

    Reply
  22. Prof Byron Sharp says

    February 11, 2013 at 4:04 pm

    In all my career I have never seen a loyalty metric that didn’t refect a brand’s (recent past) market share. All brands get some loyalty (in line with their share).

    Reply
  23. Ken says

    February 12, 2013 at 5:24 am

    There’s a big difference between a bottle of Heinz catsup and a Hyundai, and a huge range of products in between. Loyalty doesn’t mean the same thing across that spectrum.

    Reply
  24. Richard Stacy says

    February 12, 2013 at 7:23 am

    I am not sure that Kevin Roberts actually believes what he says. He just says it because he knows marketing directors can fall in love with Lovemarks – and when that happens he has captured their loyalty.

    I think loyalty is an outdated concept, especially in the new marketing environment that is being shaped by social media. In this new social world loyalty means sticking by someone through thick and thin, not incentivised repeat purchase – brands will never be able to attain this type of loyalty (it is not just beyond reason, it is beyond all possibility).

    However, brands can create respect – and fundamentally they do this by simply listening to consumers / customers and answering their questions – not by trying to make people love them, ‘Like’ them or even be their ‘Friend’.

    http://richardstacy.com/2013/02/01/just-answer-the-question/
    http://richardstacy.com/2013/02/06/the-blessed-trinity-of-social-media-behaviours/

    Reply
  25. Tony Mariani says

    February 12, 2013 at 9:12 am

    Bob Hoffman, The Ad Contrarian pointed out this article about how our buying habits change.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/science/study-in-science-shows-end-of-history-illusion.html?exprod=myyahoo&_r=2&

    Reply
  26. Gail Gardner says

    February 18, 2013 at 2:51 am

    Most big brands – and even small businesses – do not really focus on what customers want so they are unlikely to get much loyalty. Corporations turn everything into a commodity and since they rarely have decent customer service who cares which one you buy?

    They’re missing the boat. They CAN offer us what we want – but only if they know what it is and even when we try to tell them they ignore us. Here are some examples:

    Kim OQuinn says sugar is a commodity. I wonder if her company realizes the growing interest in buying ONLY pure cane sugar and avoiding sugar made from sugar beets because it is likely to be GMO. Do they know people are sharing tips on how to determine what kind of sugar is in a bag or box? She says they have bakers. Does her company know that sugar from beets performs much less satisfactorily in baked goods than cane sugar and many bakers avoid it?

    Any company that makes something we eat can create brand loyalty by being ethical, applying REAL Fair Trade principles (not the illusionary kind created by big corps), learning what people are really working to find and avoid (harder than ever with organic standards turned into a joke) and becoming TRUSTED.

    Search for #buylocal #shoplocal #eatlocal on Twitter and see how much buzz there is surrounding finding REAL food. People like me do not eat packaged chemical laden gmo rbgh radiated microwaved junk (what many of them even call “Frankenfoods”).

    Any company that can be TRUSTED will get brand loyalty. We pay more for nutritious food. Many of us don’t care if it is certified organic – we want to know where it comes from and how it is grown, handled, packaged and shipped. Read the details on Eden Foods Web site about them testing for radiation to get some idea. As Tracy Carlson said, she would drive to another city to Trader Joe’s if they moved. Same reason.

    Local grocery stores could create loyalty by carrying what we want that is nearly impossible to find locally. In Texas, many drive 45-60 miles into Dallas or another metro to go to Whole Foods to buy those dozen or so things we refuse to do without: fluoride-free toothpaste, Dr. Bronner’s soaps, Aubrey’s Organic hair care products, Traumed / Traumeel tablets and cream, etc.

    If they had those items we would not drive to Whole Foods – we would buy everything in THEIR store. Small grocers can’t compete on price so they need to compete to selling what big chains don’t – and then get someone like me to make sure people who want them KNOW they carry them. That means we want locally grown produce, locally raised free range meats, and non-corporate brands of food packaged by companies that won’t poison us to save a penny.

    Another way to create brand loyalty is by making products of high quality and emphasizing lifetime cost instead of cheapest. I only buy shoes from SAS and boots from Tony Lama and Ariat because they last and they are comfortable and support my feet. THEY have brand loyalty.

    Finally, great customer service with a friendly, helpful attitude creates brand loyalty. People WILL pay more and drive further to shop and eat where they get great service with a smile. I always do and I am NOT the only person who does. Even price shoppers WILL go out of their way to eat at their favorite restaurant or buy from a favorite shop.

    That means you give your front-facing employees the power to make your customers happy, you treat them with respect (because how you treat them is how they treat your customers), and you TRAIN THEM to do a great job. Many a small business goes under because they don’t realize how incompetent or useless their employees are while many corporations don’t care or downsize their staff until there is no way they can do their jobs properly.

    Too bad most companies do not listen to what their customers tell them. With social media, reviews, surveys they really have no excuse. Make it easy for customers and employees to complain anonymously – and then actually hear what they’re telling you. Then go fix it.

    Reply
  27. Gail Gardner says

    February 18, 2013 at 3:09 am

    Before people keep insisting that there is no brand loyalty any more, I want to share some examples of companies that have been around a long time and never lost it: Snapper Mowers and Master Lock. They didn’t go cheap. Snapper told Wal-Mart no. And both products have great reputations and many only buy from them.

    Many newer companies that have strong brand royalty are related to organic products and food: Aubrey Organics, Arbico Organics, Ark Naturals, Natural Organic Warehouse, Marcal Small Steps, Seventh Generation to name a few.

    Great brands are so hard to find that I actually have a page I maintain where I collect Recommended Brands. Those are all examples of companies that created brand loyalty – and I would love to add to it. Businesses that understand customer satisfaction needs to be making themselves more obvious online so people like me can get others we mentor and collaborate with to recommend them.

    Reply
  28. john hawkins says

    February 24, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    I have negative brand loyality. When shopping at walmart and other low rent stores ( food lion, Hardies)I never buy the store brand. This is because of negative experience with their quality. I will buy any national brand instead

    Reply
  29. tomfishburne says

    February 24, 2013 at 9:49 pm

    Hi all, many thanks for sharing such insightful commentary around loyalty. I found this really useful. This week’s print goes to Simon McEvoy. I really like the perspective of brands showing loyalty to consumers. Thanks! -Tom

    Reply
  30. Melanie Varley says

    September 6, 2013 at 2:47 pm

    This is not an either / or debate.. Our research project, MEC Momentum, across 12 countries with over a 100,000 sample identifies consumers ‘passive’ stage bias and the import on the actual purchase decision. Across categories, passive stage bias, built up by brand availability and presence amongst other things, translates to being on the shopping list, less price sensitivity and shorter purchase cycles. The trigger for purchase plays a critical role. top up or specific need – i.e. bad dry skin. Commodity categories, in everyday shopping situations, as Byron Sharp says, are prey to price promotion. So which brand on the shortlist is on offer? And communications can play very different roles at different points of the purchase journey to help build brand momentum. . See mecglobal.com for more information on MEC Momentum.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Paid licensing options include high resolution download.
  • Presentation $35.00 Add to Cart
  • Newsletter or Website $100.00 Add to Cart
  • Corporate Blog/Sponsored Post $50.00 Add to Cart
  • Looking for other licensing options? click here
  • View Cart
Your Ad Ignored Here Book Image

15 years of Marketoonist compiled for your marketing pleasure.

Order Now

About Marketoonist

tom_image

Marketoonist is the thought bubble of Tom Fishburne a career marketer and cartoonist. Learn More...

Subscribe

Get a new marketoon delivered to your inbox each week.

 

Browse Blog Posts

Most Popular Cartoons Browse Categories

Marketoon Campaigns

contentmarketing

Content marketing with a sense of humor.

Learn More

Keynote Speaking

speakingworkshops

Insightful, funny, and visual keynote talks and workshops.

Book Tom to Speak

Search Blog Posts

Interested? Let’s Talk!

Marketoons

Browse Categories

Get New Cartoons Weekly

About Marketoonist

Tom Fishburne is the Founder and CEO of Marketoonist, a content marketing studio that helps businesses reach their audiences with cartoons.

© 2023 Marketoonist